Influence of Teaching Style on Students’ Engagement, Curiosity and Exploration in the Classroom


  • Awaisha Inayat University of Karachi
  • Amena Zehra Ali University of Karachi


autonomous-supportive teaching style, controlling teaching style, curiosity and exploration, student engagement


Interaction between teachers and students carries immense significance inside classrooms as it contributes to students’ learning. The present study aims to explore perceived teaching style (autonomous-supportive and/or controlling) and its correlation with students’ engagement, curiosity and exploration in crosssectional sample of school and university students (N= 402). Three questionnaires were used: Perceived Parental Autonomy Support Scale P-PASS (Mageau, et al., 2015); Student Engagement Instrument (Appleton, Christenson, Kim, & Reschly, 2006); and Curiosity and Exploration Inventory (Kashdan, et al., 2009). The results showed that students simultaneously perceived both teaching styles, that is, Autonomous-supportive and Controlling. However, a significant difference was observed between the score of school students where they found their teachers to be more supportive (t (402)=3.942) and controlling (t (402)=4.774) as compared to university students. Furthermore, there was moderate correlation between perceived autonomy support teaching style with students’ engagement (r=.463) as well as curiosity and exploration (r=.318). The results offer an understanding of students’ perceptions of teaching style contributing to students’ curiosity and motivation to engage in classroom.


Ali, A., & Ahmad, I. (2011). Key factors for determining students’ satisfaction in distance learning courses: A study of Allama Iqbal Open University. Contemporary Educational Technology, 2(2), 118-134.

Allan, J., Clarke, K., & Jopling, M. (2009). Effective teaching in higher education: Perceptions of first year undergraduate students. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 3(21), 362-372.

Amoura, C., Berjot, S., Gillet, N., Caruana, S., Cohen, J., & Finez, L. (2015). Original communication autonomy-supportive and controlling styles of teaching-opposite or distinct teaching style? Swiss Journal of Psychology, 3(74), 141-158.

Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., & Furlong, M. J. (2008). Student engagement with school: Critical conceptual and methodological issues of the construct. Psychology in the Schools, 45(5), 369-386.

Benita, M., Roth, G., & Deci, E. (2014). When are mastery goals more adaptive? It depends on experiences of autonomy support and autonomy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1(106), 258-267.

Conrad, L. (2017). Students' attachment styles to their professors: Patterns of achievement, curiosity, exploration, self-criticism, self-reassurance, and autonomy. All College Thesis Program, (30).

Davis, H. A. (2003). Conceptualizing the role and influence of student-teacher relationships on children's social and cognitive development. Educational Psychologist, 38(4), 207-234.

Fall, A., & Roberts, G. (2012). High school dropouts: Interactions between social context, self-perceptions, school engagement, and student dropout. Journal of Adolescence, 35(4), 787-798.

Gillet, N., Vallerand, R. J., Amoura, C., & Baldes, B. (2010). Influence of coaches' autonomy support on athelets' motivation and sport performance: A test of heirarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 11(2), 155161.

Hallihan, M. (2008). Teacher influences on students' attachment to school. Sociology of Education, 81(3), 271-283.

Jaggars, S. S., & Xu, D. (2016). How do online course design features influence student performance? Computers & Education, 95, 270- 284.

Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99(1), 122.

Kashdan, T., Gallagheer, M., Silvia, P., Breen, W., Terhar, D., & Steger, M. (2009). The curiosity and exploration inventory-II: Development, factor structure, and initial psychometrics. Journal of Research in Personaltiy, 43(6), 987-998.

Klem, A. M., & Connell, J. P. (2004). Relationships matter: Linking teacher support to student engagement and achievement. Journal of School Health, 74(7), 262-273.

Ladyshewsky, R. (2013). Instructor presence in online courses and student satisfaction. The International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 7(1), 1-23.

Lee J., & Bonk, C. J. (2016). Social network analysis of peer relationships and online interactions in a blended class using blogs. The Internet and Higher Education, 28, 35-44.

Lizzio, A., Wilson, K., & Simons, R. (2002). University students' perceptions of the learning environment and academic outcomes: implications for theory and practice. Studies in Higher Education, 27(1), 27-52.

Luo, N., Zhang, M., & Qi, D. (2017). Effects of different interactions on students’ sense of community in e-learning environment. Computers & Education, 115, 153-160. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2017.08.006

Mageau, G., Ranger, F., Joussemet, M., Koestner, R., Moreau, E., & Forest, J. (2015). Validation of the perceived parental autonomy support scale (P-PASS). Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science. 47, 251-262.

Moreau, E., & Mageau, G. A. (2012). The importance of perceived autonomy support for the psychological health and work satisfaction of health professionals: Not only supervisors count, colleagues too! Motivation and Emotion, 36(3), 268-286.

Nandi, P. L., Chan, J. N., Chan, C. P., Chan, P., & Chan, L. P. (2000). Undergraduate medical education: Comparison of problem-based learning and conventional teaching. Hong Kong Medical Journal, 6(3), 301-306.

Ouyang, F., & Scharger, C. (2017). The influences of an experienced instructor’s discussion design and facilitation on an online learning community development: A social network analysis study. The Internet and Higher Education, 35, 34-47.

Pelletier, L. G., Fortier, M. S., Vallerand, R. J., & Briere, N. M. (2001). Associations among perceived autonomy support, forms of self-regulation, and persistence: A prospective study. Motivation and Emotion, 25(4), 279-306.

Quan-Haase, A. (2007). University students’ local and distant social ties: Using and integrating modes of communication in campus. Information, Communication & Society, 10(5), 671-693.

Reio, T. G., Marcus, R. F., & Sanders-Reio, J. (2009). Contribution of student and instructor relationships and attachment style to school completion. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 170(1), 53-72.

Riley, P. (2009). An adult attachment perspective on the student–teacher relationship & classroom management difficulties. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(5), 626-635.

Ryan, A. M., & Patrick, H. (2001). The classroom social environment and changes in adolescents’ motivation and engagement during middle school. American Educational Research Journal, 38(2), 437-460.

Sierens, E., Vansteenkiste, M., Goossens, L., Soenens, B., & Dochy, F. (2009). The synergistic relationship of perceived autonomy support and structure in the prediction of selfregulated learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(1), 57-68.

Sikander, Z. (2013). O level-matriculation disparity. Retrieved from https://www.dawn. com/news/1016830

Sinclair, M. F., Christenson, S. L., & Thurlow, M. L. (2005). Promoting school completion of urban secondary youth with emotional or behavioral disabilities. Exceptional Children, 71(4), 465-482.

Skinner, E. A., & Belmont, M. J. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(4), 571-5S81.

Smith, E.E. (2016). A real double-edged sword: Undergraduate perceptions of social media in their learning. Computers & Education, 103, 44-58.

Soenens, B., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2010). A theoretical upgrade of the concept of parental psychological control: Proposing new insights on the basis of self-determination theory. Developmental Review, 30, 74-99.

Tessier, D., Sarrazin, P., & Ntoumanis, N. (2008). The effects of an experimental programme to support students’ autonomy on the overt behaviours of physical education teachers. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 23(3), 239.

Vansteenkiste, M., Sierens, E., Goossens, L., Soenens, B., Dochy, F., Mouratidis, A., & Beyers, W. (2012). Identifying configurations of perceived teacher autonomy support and structure: Associations with self-regulated learning, motivation and problem behavior. Learning and Instruction, 22(6), 431-439.



How to Cite

Inayat, A. ., & Ali , A. Z. . (2020). Influence of Teaching Style on Students’ Engagement, Curiosity and Exploration in the Classroom. Journal of Education and Educational Development, 7(1). Retrieved from